Rusty here, with the final part of this set. So, before I start rambling too much, let’s dive in…
"Iron Man"
“I am Iron Man”
What a killer final line. That’s Tony Stark nicely summed up in that one moment. That charming, horny, brilliant, semi-weasely billionaire embraces the chance to step up, to finally mean something to someone besides himself. Just watch that final press conference scene—look how disheartened Stark was when he wasn’t accused of being a “superhero.” He’s loving this moment—he’s on top of the world. Well, great…now the sequel can come and knock him down a few pegs or two (like it should).
Like (I’m sure) many of you, I loved “Iron Man.” Director Jon Favreau managed to make a superhero film that wasn’t corny (like some other Marvel movies that shall go unnamed) nor intensely dramatic, but rather one that proudly fell into its own distinct category—a sharp, endlessly clever, and still emotionally involving entry into the superhero canon. Stark isn’t Batman, but nor is he trying to be. You can watch “The Dark Knight” in amazement and awe—“Iron man” watches like a fun night with some great friends (albeit very exciting, ass-kicking ones). Robert Downey Jr. was perfect in a role that now seems tailor-made, and the film seemed to adjust to his style—loose and fun for the most part, but believably dramatic at the turn of a hat. Villain-wise, it was kind of weak and predictable, but that didn’t matter, since the character work was dead-on, and the film’s terrific sense of humor (and solid action) more than compensated for the lesser moments.
So now we’re at Part 2. About a year after the original came out, Director Jon Favreau (he’ll always be “so money” from “Swingers”), Downey, Marvel head honcho Kevin Feige, and newbie cast members Don Cheadle (replacing Terrance Howard from the first film), the great Sam Rockwell (as new villain and Tony Stark-like weapons-manufacturer, Justin Hammer), and Scarlett Johansson (joining the cast as Stark’s new assistant/Russian super spy, the Black Widow) all came to Comic-Con for the world-premiere footage of next summer’s extremely anticipated sequel.
And, simply put…it looked pretty awesome!
But, wait, let’s backtrack a bit. Marvel Pictures branched out a few years back and won back the rights to some of their greatest characters. In turn, as the first wave of their independently-produced films, we got “Iron Man” and Edward Norton’s excellent take on “The Incredible Hulk” (which I really hope gets a sequel too). But Marvel went a step further—for the first time that I’ve ever really seen this, they started combining their characters into one common universe. SPOILER ALERT: the ending shot of the “Incredible Hulk” had Downey Jr., fresh off the events of “Iron Man” (and possibly the sequel?), walk in to a bar to talk to the Hulk’s nemesis, General Ross, about forming a “special team”.
Yep, that’s nothing less than Marvel’s dream-team—the Avengers. But it wasn’t a hollow tease. Marvel has three more pictures planned after “Iron Man 2”—“Thor”, “Captain America,” and we better believe it: “The Avengers” in 2012, featuring those three heroes, and (hopefully) Edward Norton’s Hulk in some capacity. I was crazy about that scene in “The Incredible Hulk”. How rarely do you get to see characters from different movies interacting? How awesome would it be to see fine actors like Downey and Norton playing together (and the actors who’ll fill the costumes for Captain America and the might Nordic god, Thor), bringing real sincerity and talent to an epic superhero story?
And therein is the great challenge. Sequels are a tricky business to begin with. More often than not, “bigger and better” is taken too literally, and we end up getting more noise, explosions, and stuff looking “cool” than a continued arc of a character we love, than actual development for people we’ve come to care about. I don’t know about you guys, but I’ve lost track of how many times have I’ve been let down by Parts 2’s and 3’s, by filmmakers who seemed to forget what made their original films so great. Sure, it’s not exactly life-changing bits of depression, but we grow to care for all these larger-than-life people—they’re only worth revisiting if there’s more of their story to tell. It’s so much more rewarding to see them progress in new, relatable stories, as opposed to watching them fight more stuff and face bigger, more expensive special effects.
As such, “Iron Man 2” has to take Tony Stark someplace new, becoming its own story and a strong entry into the “Iron Man” series, all the while setting the ground work for his team-up with Marvel’s superheroic finest—a smooth transition into the geeky, ridiculous insanity that will be “The Avengers”—piece of cake, right?
Well, it’s too early to tell, but, from the looks of it, Favreau, Downey, and co. at the very least will give us something interesting, new, and very, very fun to watch. This sequel looks to pick up hot on the heels of “Iron Man”’s brilliant closing line. The world now knows he’s Iron Man, so how does Stark deal with that? With the pressure, with the attention, with his own not-exactly-perfect-or-moral lifestyle? It’s a great launching pad, and it’ll be cool to see where the filmmakers go with this. Will it live up to the first one? It’s impossible to make that call yet, but, in terms of what we saw, it should give the first film a good run for its money.
But let’s get to that footage…
Footage:
It all starts with Downey, half-dressed in the Iron-Man suit, sitting atop Randy’s Donuts in L.A. (you know, in the actual giant donut). In walks Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson, in all his steely, eye-patched cool), who chides Downey for not joining his “special team”. Stark is still fast and quippy (his response to Fury: “This is confusing me. Which eye do I address?”)…but we can see that Stark is clearly struggling—the whole “everyone-knows-who-you-are” part of the job is getting to him, and he’s feeling low…we just don’t know exactly why. What exactly happened to put him here? Very cleverly not revealed. Nicely done, Mr. Favreau—you got me hooked already.
The next thing shown was an extended sequence. In some courtroom, with Gwyneth Paltrow’s Pepper Potts (his right-hand woman, conscience, and, as we obviously know, his true love) right behind him, Stark is facing down a committee of Senators, led by the deadpan Garry Schandling. They want this Iron Man armor, thinking it’s a weapon. But Stark, always one step ahead, mocks them all, and celebrates himself “officially privatizing world peace.” The court then calls Stark’s best friend, Jim Rhodes, to testify, launching into my favorite part of the footage.
In walks Cheadle, and bumps into Downey for a quick exchange. Most of us heard the messy business with Terrence Howard being replaced for the sequel. I thought he was very enjoyable in the original, and would’ve loved to see where he took his character (not to mention finally become Iron Man’s metal-clad, super-ally, War Machine). The recasting also really cheapens that great moment where Howard, watching Downey fly off into the sky, looks at his old armor, grins, and says “Next time, baby.” Well, not so much.
Still, as much as that news sucks, whether it was because of salary negations or bigger creative reasons (there was some rumor rumbling that Favreau wasn’t too happy with Howard’s performance), the change is done. Cheadle’s a fine actor, with a great sense of humor and strong presence, so we know the role is in good hands. But the footage took it a step further, in a tiny, perfectly executed moment.
As Rhodes walks to the testifying bench, he bumps into Stark, who can’t believe they dragged him into this. Rhodes, plainly and simply, just says: “Look, it’s me. I’m here. Let’s get over it and move on.” I love moments like that—it works for the story and the character relationships, but simultaneously comments on things outside of the movie. It’s quick and subtle, but it’s absolutely right. Yeah, it’s disappointing Howard couldn’t finish the role he originated, but there’s nothing we can do now. Let’s just accept it and move on. Cheadle will do right by the fans, and I personally can’t wait to see what he does with the role.
After that, the footage launches into a series of quick sequences and images. We see bits of Scarlett Johansson, believably knocking down some bad guys as the Black Widow, Mickey Rourke, with a thick (and legitimate!) Russian accent, building a powered suit of his own, and a quick throwaway shot of Downey’s chest piece, with some kind of infection seemingly spreading from it. Finally, we see Mickey Rourke in full-on costume mode as Whiplash. Now, this is the picture they released a month back…
I wasn’t too impressed with it—it looks a little rough, cheaply made (maybe that’s the point?) and unexciting, but, man, just wait until you see those super-charged, electrified whips in action. It looks phenomenal, and Rourke looks like he’s relishing playing this type of character (as well as his own Hollywood comeback). He should make a good match, both physically and dramatically, for Downey’s Stark.We see one more money shot of Iron Man flying around, evading explosions, and the screen goes black.
We think it’s over…but then the footage has one more surprise up its sleeve. A brand-new scene opens, with Sam Rockwell’s Justin Hammer walking in to meet Cheadle in an airplane hanger. Rockwell jokes around a bit (he should be great fun in this role), and offers Cheadle a variety of weapons he brought along.
“So, which ones will it be?” he asks him.
“I’ll take them all.” Rhodes replies, with absolute cool.
And the very next shot, we see Rhodes as War Machine, in total badass glory, shooting things left and right from his new, weapon-clad silver armor. For a movie that just finished filing last week, the effects look superb, and this shot of War Machine in particular had fans going crazy in the Convention Hall.
We got tons of juicy details, but the plot isn’t exactly clear yet. I like that—I actually want to be surprised come next May. We know Johansson’s character is Russian (with a name like Natasha Romanov, what else could she be?), so there could be some connection to Mickey Rourke’s Whiplash. Similarly, we heard Justin Hammer is the second villain, so there might be some shady dealings between him and Whiplash too. And I was most intrigued by that shot of Downey’s infected chest piece. I have no idea where they could take that story element, but it opens up some interesting possibilities.
All in all, it looks like the filmmakers have some excellent material for this sequel. I’m still going to be cautiously optimistic (“Spider-Man 3” had a fantastic trailer too…), but we’re definitely looking at one of next year’s biggest hits (and hopefully a deserving one too).
Panel:
As for the actual panel, it was everything you’d expect from these guys. Favreau was funny and informative (though very careful not to reveal anything substantial—he’s become a master of the tantalizing hint), Downey was his usual entertaining self, and Cheadle and Rockwell look like great additions to the cast.
Johansson was actually my biggest wild card for the new film. She can be so good with the right material (“Lost in Translation,” “Match Point”), but, for me, she’s been kind of hit-or-miss with her latest films (“The Island,” “The Other Boleyn Girl”). Still, the footage looks like she jumped for the chance to play the Black Widow, and Favreau even added how impressed he was when she dyed her hair red weeks before she even got the part. We also found out that she won’t have to do the Russian accent—definitely good news all-around, since it would’ve been ridiculously distracting. (Really, Tony Stark would find nothing suspicious of someone as gorgeous as Johansson working for him, with a think Boris-and-Natasha accent to boot?) She’s a wonderful actress under the right circumstances, and it looks like she took this role seriously, with a good dash of fun as well in playing such a cool-chick character.
I loved some of their anecdotes, particularly Favreau’s story of how the Russian government was thrilled to offer Mickey Rourke a “research” stay in one of their prisons (looks like Whiplash did some time before he enters the story). Turns out, the first big import movie after Perestroika was “9 ½ Weeks,” and Rourke still holds a special place as an uber-sex symbol for my people. Downey had a good bit as well, when asked about working with Mickey Rourke, and he put it best as: “Man, and I thought I was eccentric.”
My personal favorite thing, though, was Cheadle’s response to this question:
“What do you like better, playing a good guy in “Iron Man 2,” or a villain in “Meteor Man”?
Cheadle paused, and then, with perfect timing:
“Yeah, I don’t know what that second movie is.”
The footage was then played again to the crowd’s overwhelming cheers, and the panel members thanked the crowd, with a genuine reminder that it was Comic-Con and the fans that broke the original “Iron Man” from a big question mark to one of the most anticipated movies (and biggest hits) of last summer.
Overall, easily one of the best panels of the convention (although, I agree with Ace—the “Chuck” panel wins it by a nose). Whether the sequel’s any good really remains to be seen, but it looks like the cast and crew sincerely tried to make this one as worthy (if not better) than the original movie.
May 7, 2010? We’ll see you then, Mr. Stark.
You are Iron Man, indeed.
Images courtesy of Marvel Pictures and Paramount Pictures.
No comments:
Post a Comment